Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics
This journal adheres to the highest standards of publication ethics set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). We are committed to ensuring transparency, integrity, accountability, and fairness in every aspect of the editorial and publication process. Any violations will result in the retraction of the article or the blocking of the author.
Author Responsibilities
Authors must submit original work that has not been published and is not under consideration by another journal, ensuring that all data provided is accurate, authentic, and free from falsification, manipulation, or plagiarism (including self-plagiarism). All sources must be cited appropriately. If there is a conflict of interest, it can be disclosed at the end after the conclusion subchapter, and a funding statement can be included if applicable. Content generated by artificial intelligence (AI) must be explicitly stated.
Reviewer's Tasks
Reviewers objectively assess articles from authors based on the following criteria:
a)    Title (concise, compact, and descriptive of the research)
b)    Problems & objectives of the research
c)    Urgency of the Research
d)    Depth of the relationship between variables and Hypotheses
e)    Depth of discussion of results and suggestions  

Reviewers are also tasked with assisting editors in decision-making by providing objective, impartial, and constructive feedback based on assessments in their respective fields. They also help maintain confidentiality and report to editors if ethical issues are suspected. Reviewers must not use unpublished material for personal gain and must complete reviews within the specified time frame.